>The Google Debate

>There’s very little I can add to the ongoing Google Book Settlement Debate, other than to remark that I feel like a very small fish caught up in a tsunami. Do I go with the flow? If so, where will it take me? Or do I try to swim against it? Salmon can climb waterfalls after all.

If you’re not clear on what the debate’s about, there’s plenty out there on the net about it. Just Google “Google Book Settlement” (oh, the irony). In a nutshell, it’s about Google scanning out-of-print books in the US and making them available online. Sounds simple, but boy is it a can of worms. It’s not even started its run through the US courts and already it’s kicked up so much dust it’s hard to see what’s really going on. Suffice it to say the issues range from questions on how you both interpret and apply of the laws of copyright and intellectual property, all the way through to the future creation of a global digital library.

What do I care? Well, I’m an author with out-of-print material that falls slap into the terms of the settlement. What that means is that, unless I opt out today – and I do mean today because that’s the deadline – Google will consider my books up for grabs. So for example they could take my 1995 novel Dragoncharm and turn it into an online edition. Probably with adverts for dog food or lingerie interleaved between the pages. If I opt in (a decision I can at least defer for a while) I get to choose how much of the text is made available, and possibly to benefit from future revenue streams generated by the advertising, or by any other channel.

You might think opting in sounds good. In many ways it does … sort of. But there are lots of other things going on behind the scenes. The word monopoly springs to mind. And as an author with a vested interest in copyright law – we’re talking about one of the ways I put food on the table here, not to mention my fundamental moral rights as a holder of both intellectual property and copyright – I resent the fact I’ve got to make a choice about doing business with an organisation that I’ve never sat round a table with. This particular point (and the entire debate actually) is articulated incredibly well by Nick Harkaway on his blog.

So do I opt out today, or leave myself the choice of opting in later? If I do neither, Google will probably scan my work anyway. Can I really swim against the current? As Nick remarks on his blog, “Even now, there are thousands of really good books which are not getting written because everyone is so sodding stressed about it.”

Me included!

One thought on “>The Google Debate

  1. >Wow, I need to look into this further but it just throws up lots of usability issues.How do they get hold of out of print books? Are they only going to use books that have been published. And how does this affect those who went for POD? My hubby had a POD book but because of issues with the publisher, it never really got anywhere. So will he have to opt out/in too.If you opt in, do you have the option of only allowing them to put one word of your book online? That's what I would be tempted to do.Having said that, I am fundamentally against any computer system that has Opt In as the default option. That sucks.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s